Understanding of the health effects of specific interventions is a key objective of epidemiology. Policies, whether implemented by governments or other institutions, have immense potential to influence population health and thus represent important study exposures for epidemiologists. However, because policies are often implemented without specific consideration of or plans for evaluation, there are two key challenges to any attempt to evaluate their effects: data availability and the methodological challenges associated with estimating causal effects using observational data. Fortunately, both the number and diversity of data sources that are available to health and other social science researchers are vast and constantly growing. In addition, there is a rich history of methodological advancement across multiple disciplines (most notably economics, statistics, political science, epidemiology, and biostatistics) pertaining to the evaluation of intervention effects in observational settings. The availability of large, novel data sources and a diverse set of methodological tools, combined with recent calls for a more “consequentialist” epidemiology that focuses as much on the effects of interventions as it does on understanding etiology, makes it an exciting time to be an epidemiologist. As such, the studies that constitute this dissertation aim to evaluate the health effects of three distinct sets of policies using diverse administrative and observational data sources and methods developed across multiple disciplines.
The first study evaluates the impacts of two national policies that aimed to expand access to buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder. The United States continues to grapple with an unprecedented opioid overdose epidemic and expanding access to medications for the treatment of opioid use disorder (MOUD), such as buprenorphine, is a key priority in the national response to the epidemic. This study uses comprehensive administrative data sources from California to evaluate the effects of 2016 policies expanding the buprenorphine waiver program on buprenorphine prescribing and opioid-related health outcomes.
The second study evaluates the impact of two clinic-level policies that aimed to reduce opioid prescribing at a safety-net clinic in 2013 and 2014 in San Francisco, CA. In addition to expanding access to MOUD, a concurrent strategy for addressing the opioid crisis has been to reduce unnecessary prescribing of opioid medications. However, there is ongoing concern that inflexible one-size-fits-all reductions in opioid prescribing could ultimately harm patients, and even result in transitions from prescription opioid use and dependence to heroin use and dependence. In 2013 and 2014, the clinic under study established standard protocols for dispensing opioid refills and conducting urine toxicology testing and a new committee facilitating opioid treatment decisions for complex patient cases. Using data from a retrospective cohort study of patients on long-term opioid therapy, this study evaluates the effects of these policies on opioid prescribing and use of heroin and opioid analgesics not prescribed to the patient.
The third study evaluates the impact of a major California criminal justice policy on mortality among state prisoners. In October 2011, California Assembly Bill 109 (AB109) sought to decrease the prison population by prospectively shifting the custodial responsibility of non-violent, non-serious, and non-sexual offenders from state prisons to county jails and probation departments. Leveraging several complementary data sources, this study evaluates the effects of AB109 on California state prisoner mortality.
Collectively, these studies contribute new evidence regarding the effects of these three sets of policies. Furthermore, two of the studies demonstrate the utility of administrative data sources for assessing the impacts of real-world interventions. As these data sources expand and become more organized, rigorous analyses that leverage their strengths and acknowledge their limitations will grow increasingly valuable as a tool for knowledge creation among epidemiologists and other applied researchers.