A fundamental controversy is whether cognitive decline with advancing age can be entirely explained by decreased processing speed, or whether specific neural changes can elicit cognitive decline, independent of slowing. These hypotheses are anchored by studies of healthy older individuals where age is presumed the sole influence. Unfortunately, advancing age is also associated with asymptomatic brain white matter injury. We hypothesized that differences in white matter injury extent, manifest by MRI white matter hyperintensities (WMH), mediate differences in visual attentional control in healthy aging, beyond processing speed differences. We tested young and cognitively healthy older adults on search tasks indexing speed and attentional control. Increasing age was associated with generally slowed performance. WMH were also associated with slowed search times independent of processing speed differences. Consistent with evidence attributing reduced network connectivity to WMH, these results conclusively demonstrate that clinically silent white matter injury contributes to slower search performance indicative of compromised cognitive control, independent of generalized slowing of processing speed.

Background and purpose

Aging is accompanied by clinically silent cerebral white matter injury identified through white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)- and diffusion tensor imaging-based measures of white matter integrity. The temporal course of FLAIR and diffusion tensor imaging changes within WMHs and their less-injured periphery (ie, their penumbra), however, has not been fully studied. We used longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging and FLAIR to explore these changes.

Methods

One hundred fifteen participants, aged 73.7±6.7 years, received clinical evaluations and MRIs on 2 dates. WMHs and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps were produced from FLAIR and diffusion tensor imaging and coregistered to a standardized space. Each distinct WMH was categorized as growing, stagnant, or noncontiguous incident. The penumbra of each WMH was similarly categorized as corresponding to a stagnant, growing, or noncontiguous incident WMH. Linear mixed-effect models were used to assess whether FA and FLAIR measurements changed between baseline and follow-up and differed between tissue categories.

Results

Baseline FA differed significantly by tissue category, with the following ordering of categories from highest to lowest FA: penumbra of noncontiguous incident, then stagnant, then growing WMHs; noncontiguous incident, then stagnant, then growing WMHs. Despite differences in baseline values, all tissue categories experienced declines in FA over time. Only noncontiguous incident WMHs showed significant FLAIR signal increases over time, and FLAIR signal significantly decreased in stagnant WMHs.

Conclusions

WMHs and their penumbra vary in severity and together span a continuous spectrum of white matter injury that worsens with time. FLAIR fails to capture this continuous injury process fully but does identify a subclass of lesions that seem to improve over time.