Background: Early Mobilization (EM) in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU) is safe and feasible. However, there are many issues preventing the adoption of EM into clinical practice.

Aim: The first aim is to use in-depth interviews, including open-ended and semi-structured questions, explore nurses’ concerns for patient safety while performing EM and how nurses overcome those safety concerns and still choose to participate in EM. The focus of the interviews is on describing the dimensions of patient safety concerns and how nurses develop strategies to safely deliver EM to their patients. The second aim is to use in-depth interviews, to explore, describe and analyze nurses’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to performing EM, and to identify strategies nurses perceive would assist them to overcome barriers and increase adoption of EM within the PICU.

Methods: This focused ethnographic study included 15 in-depth interviews with 10 PICU nurses. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: This is a three article-based dissertation. The first article is a scoping review of the literature examining nurses’ and family caregivers’ perceptions of early mobility programs in the PICU. This article was instrumental in identifying the scope of the dissertation study after the gaps in the literature were identified. In the second article, nurses discussed their perceptions of barriers to EM care in the PICU, beyond patient safety. In the third article, nurses perceived three categories of barriers: nurse engagement and nursing and unit factors, resources and equipment issues, and interdisciplinary issues. Facilitators to EM include improved condition with mobility, rehabilitation team, and impact on unit culture. The overarching theme that integrated these categories was nurses’ commitment to EM because they recognize the benefit and see the positive outcomes. These barriers presented challenges and nurses felt frustrated by having to navigate through these barriers, but these frustrations created opportunities for nurses to brainstorm and strategize ideas to overcome these barriers.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the importance of thoughtfully considering the burden evidence-based programs have on the nurses who carry out EM. EM activities fall primarily on nursing staff, and organizational structures and resources must be allocated to reliably deliver this essential care. By better understanding the barriers, leaders can analyze and develop strategies to better integrate EM into practice.

Abstract

Undocumented Mexican immigrant women in the United States are increasing in numbers, and the causes of the social and health inequalities that afflict this vulnerable group of women remain enigmatic. The Latino epidemiological paradox reflects a deceivingly positive overall scenario of wellness, despite the fact that foreign-born Mexican women have a higher prevalence of certain chronic diseases than their U.S.-born counterparts. Current health policies have been created to purposefully exclude undocumented individuals, thus further widening the existing inequities. The research literature focusing on this under-studied group of immigrants is sparse, with the studies being primarily epidemiological in nature, therefore inadequately designed to reveal the origins of the access problem.

The purpose of this study was to understand the phenomenon of the barriers to care experienced by Mexican immigrant women who are forced to exist: (a) without the legal authorization to remain in the United States, (b) having limited or no healthcare coverage, and (c) while suffering from chronic medical conditions. This interpretive phenomenological study examined the healthcare seeking experiences of 26 Mexican immigrant women, employing in-depth interviews and participant observations as sources of data.

The findings derived from the women's narratives centered around several inter-related themes: (a) the failure on the part of healthcare staff and providers to recognize the medical needs of the Mexican immigrant women as legitimate, (b) the situatedness of the women as the defining factor of the healthcare possibilities available to them, and (c) the women's strong need to survive, and the value placed on work as the motivation to stay healthy and to provide for themselves and their families. The immigrant women participants experienced multiple constraints in managing their illnesses, and suffered debilitating effects of their medical conditions. The women responded to the constraints by making accommodations in the way they managed their chronic illnesses, often foregoing needed medications due to expense (or by obtaining them in any way they could), not seeing physicians when it seemed necessary to do so, opting for less expensive self-help techniques, and passing falsified results to gain access to certain medical resources.

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are encouraged or expected to be involved in treatment decision making (TDM). There is limited research on whether and how they want to be involved in TDM. Treatment outcomes in the AYA group have improved minimally compared to their older and younger peers. They experience treatment non-adherence rates as high as 60% that can lead to increased risk of relapse. Open communication, positive family relationships and involvement of the AYA in treatment decisions and illness management could support treatment adherence. However, there is insufficient research exploring the AYA’s involvement in TDM.

Focused Ethnography within the sociologic tradition informed by symbolic interactionism was used to explore and describe AYAs’ experiences with cancer TDM.

Semi-structured Interviews and informal participant observation were used. Thirty-one interviews were conducted with sixteen AYAs between the ages of 15 and 20 years. Participants were asked to reflect on a major recent treatment decision making experience (e.g., clinical trial or surgery) and other treatment decisions made since. Analysis included field notes, analytic memos and coding of interview transcripts. The research was conducted at two pediatric institutions.

Three dimensions related to AYAs’ involvement in cancer TDM were identified: 1) becoming experienced with cancer, 2) import of the decision and 3) decision making roles. AYAs’ preferences for participation in decision making may vary over time and by type of decision. Parents play a particularly important supportive role. Categories related to their new way of being were also identified and centered around not being able to do what they used to do, changing interpersonal relationships and living with uncertainty. Participants described spending more time with family who provided strength, support and advocacy. They described various strategies for dealing with cancer, and how they decided which activities to participate in, or avoid. Future research is needed to focus on developing and implementing interventions to assist AYAs to develop decision making skills and be involved in decisions about their care, as well and enable AYAs to feel less isolated and facilitate their adjustment to their new “cancer normal.”

Background

Objective

Design/methods

Results

Conclusions

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Aims

Background

Data sources

Discussion

Implications for nursing

Conclusion

Background

Objective

Design

Results

Conclusion