Electricity generation and the transportation sector make up a large portion of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Meeting ambitious reductions in greenhouse gasses requires large scale adoption of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) and has led to several policies and laws aimed at incentivizing PEV sales. An inadequate charging infrastructure, however, could be a major obstacle for a large-scale adoption of PEVs. Large electrical demands from PEVs could negatively affect circuitry, increase electricity costs, and exacerbate stress to local electrical components during times of high electricity usage. These issues, however, can be addressed by deploying smart-charging strategies.

This work is focused on the development of smart-charging protocols for workplace battery electric vehicle (BEV) charging. Three comprehensive smart-charging protocols with different applications are proposed. Each protocol is developed with varying degrees of focus on communication requirements and privacy concerns. The BEV-based Optimization Protocol is a decentralized, non-iterative strategy that allows BEVs to individually schedule their charging schedules. The Octopus Charger-based MILP Protocol allows octopus chargers (i.e., charging stations with multiple cables) to independently schedule charging for their assigned BEVs. The Real-Time Octopus Charger-based MILP Protocol allows octopus chargers to schedule BEV charging in real time, without prior information from BEVs. By using the appropriate cost signal and assignment algorithms, the proposed protocols can manage a parking structure demand load while reducing the number of installed charging stations.

Driving patterns from the National Household Travel Survey were used to perform simulations, to verify and quantify the effectiveness of each protocol. The proposed protocols resulted in improved peak load reductions for all simulated smart-charging scenarios, when compared with uncontrolled charging. By using octopus chargers, all protocols were able to reduce the number of charging stations needed at parking structures, while meeting the charging requests of all BEVs. Time-Of-Use rate plans from Southern California Edison were used to estimate monthly electricity costs for the simulated parking structures. The smart-charging protocols resulted in reduced electricity costs for most cases studied, when compared to uncontrolled charging.