- Kishan, Amar U;
- Chu, Fang-I;
- King, Christopher R;
- Seiferheld, Wendy;
- Spratt, Daniel E;
- Tran, Phuoc;
- Wang, Xiaoyan;
- Pugh, Stephanie E;
- Sandler, Kiri A;
- Bolla, Michel;
- Maingon, Philippe;
- De Reijke, Theo;
- Nickols, Nicholas G;
- Rettig, Matthew;
- Drakaki, Alexandra;
- Liu, Sandy T;
- Reiter, Robert E;
- Chang, Albert J;
- Feng, Felix Y;
- Sajed, Dipti;
- Nguyen, Paul L;
- Kupelian, Patrick A;
- Steinberg, Michael L;
- Boutros, Paul C;
- Elashoff, David;
- Collette, Laurence;
- Sandler, Howard M
Background
The importance of local failure (LF) after treatment of high-grade prostate cancer (PCa) with definitive radiotherapy (RT) remains unknown.Objective
To evaluate the clinical implications of LF after definitive RT.Design, setting, and participants
Individual patient data meta-analysis of 992 patients (593 Gleason grade group [GG] 4 and 399 GG 5) enrolled in six randomized clinical trials.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis
Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were developed to evaluate the relationship between overall survival (OS), PCa-specific survival (PCSS), and distant metastasis (DM)-free survival (DMFS) and LF as a time-dependent covariate. Markov proportional hazard models were developed to evaluate the impact of specific transitions between disease states on these endpoints.Results and limitations
Median follow-up was 6.4 yr overall and 7.2 yr for surviving patients. LF was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.70 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.37-2.10]), PCSS (3.10 [95% CI 2.33-4.12]), and DMFS (HR 1.92 [95% CI 1.54-2.39]), p < 0.001 for all). Patients who had not transitioned to the LF state had a significantly lower hazard of transitioning to a PCa-specific death state than those who transitioned to the LF state (HR 0.13 [95% CI 0.04-0.41], p < 0.001). Additionally, patients who transitioned to the LF state had a greater hazard of DM or death (HR 2.46 [95% CI 1.22-4.93], p = 0.01) than those who did not.Conclusions
LF is an independent prognosticator of OS, PCSS, and DMFS in high-grade localized PCa and a subset of DM events that are anteceded by LF events. LF events warrant consideration for intervention, potentially suggesting a rationale for upfront treatment intensification. However, whether these findings apply to all men or just those without significant comorbidity remains to be determined.Patient summary
Men who experience a local recurrence of high-grade prostate cancer after receiving upfront radiation therapy are at significantly increased risks of developing metastases and dying of prostate cancer.