Background

Neuro-oncology caregivers face unique challenges. Caring for a patient who has a catastrophic, life-threatening diagnosis combined with progressive neurological decline can produce great distress. Experts agree that a formalized plan of care to address the needs of the neuro-oncology caregiver is needed.

Methods

In 2013, the Division of Neuro-Oncology at the University of California, San Francisco initiated a program designed to provide additional services to address the needs of the neuro-oncology caregiver. Records have been kept outlining program development, the caregivers seen, their identified needs, and services provided.

Results

From October 2013 through August 2015 staff met with 334 "new to clinic" caregivers, 90 of whom were caring for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. One hundred ninety-eight caregivers were deemed at high risk for distress due to transitions in patient care that were occurring. One hundred forty-nine caregivers of former patients received bereavement services for up to 6 months. The areas of highest need were emotional support and advocacy issues. The number of caregiver needs increased as patients moved along the disease trajectory. The program was able to identify resources that were lacking. Dedicated staff allowed for improvement in the kinds of caregiver-specific support services offered.

Conclusion

Dedicated caregiver staff allows for developing relationships with caregivers across the disease trajectory and appears to be important in being able to offer individualized assessments and tailored care plans. Evaluation of caregiver and patient outcomes is the next step in understanding program effectiveness.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) patients fall within NCCN and ASCO guidelines for early palliative care (PC). However, data suggests they are less likely than systemic cancers to be referred to PC and often later in their illness. This results in potential missed opportunities, both for improving symptom control and earlier completion of important tasks, like advance care planning. Data on how to best incorporate comprehensive PC into routine neuro-oncology (NO) patient care is needed.

METHODS

We piloted a program embedding a PC physician into UCSF’s NO clinic one half-day per week. NO physicians were encouraged to refer GBM patients within 3 months of diagnosis and other patients with PC needs. PC visits were offered in-person, by telemedicine, or at home. PC physician and NO social worker made joint visits when possible; chaplaincy support was available by telemedicine. Data was collected using Palliative Care Quality Network (PCQN) database and patient satisfaction survey.

RESULTS

To date, 37 patients have been referred resulting in 103 visits (average 2.8 visits/person): 25% in-person; 68% telemedicine; 6% at home. PC physician and NO social worker met jointly with 46% visits. Median age was 58 years, 41% female, 81% non-Hispanic white, 84% GBM, median 9 months from diagnosis, and 73% receiving first line treatment. Interventions addressed across visits: 94% non-pain symptoms, 76% psychosocial needs; 71% pain; and 70% GOC. Results from satisfaction survey demonstrated 79% would recommend seeing PC embedded in NO to others and highest benefits were attention to practical considerations to staying healthy at home, discussing preferences for future medical care, and help with coping.

CONCLUSIONS

Embedding PC into NO clinics is a unique model for addressing symptoms and GOC early, is well received by patients and caregivers, and provides opportunities for collaboration and PC physicians to specialize in caring for needs of NO patients.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy for high grade gliomas (HGG) is limited by the blood-brain-barrier (BBB). Convection enhanced delivery (CED) improves chemotherapy delivery by utilizing fluid convection obviating the challenges of crossing the BBB while minimizing systemic toxicity. CED of nanoliposomal-irinotecan (Onivyde) showed to be a superior delivery route for anti-tumor activity in animal models. An advance of this trial is the development and use of real time CED, which utilizes MRI to visualize the CED process with the aid of co-convected contrast agents, monitoring delivery into the brain and affording for corrective action.

METHODS

This is a 3 + 3 single dose escalation trial with 2 cohorts: 20mg/ml and 40mg/ml. Onivyde and GAD were co-infused via the same catheters in a one-time delivery. The total volume of infusate, and consequently total dose, were personalized based on the patient’s tumor volume, and ranged from 20–680 mg of Onivyde, given via up to 4 catheters. Tumor diameters were allowed to be 1 – 4 cm, with injection volumes ranging from 2 – 17 mL of infusate.

RESULTS

10 patients have been treated on this protocol, all in under 5 hours. There were 7 GBs, 2 anaplastic astrocytomas, and 1 oligoastrocytoma. Seven patients lived over a year after treatment, which is remarkable since median survival rates for multiply recurrent: GBs = 8 months, AAs = 11 months. Utilizing imaging software, we correlated pre-infusion modeling of the drug distribution with post-infusion imaging. A number of technical challenges were overcome by real time monitoring; the total volume of distribution (Vd), and the Vd to volume infused (Vi) ratio for each infusion was ~2.

CONCLUSIONS

Image-guided distribution allows for safe real-time placement and adjustment of CED cannula of Onivyde into patient’s brains. Such methods allow for maximum tumor coverage and warrant further studies with repeat dosing.

The purpose of this study is to identify the needs of brain tumor patients and their caregivers to provide improved health services to these populations. Two different questionnaires were designed for patients and caregivers. Both questionnaires contained questions pertaining to three realms: disease symptoms/treatment, health care provider, daily living/finances. The caregivers' questionnaires contained an additional domain on emotional needs. Each question was evaluated for the degree of importance and satisfaction. Exploratory analyses determined whether baseline characteristics affect responder importance or satisfaction. Also, areas of high agreement/disagreement in satisfaction between the participating patient-caregiver pairs were identified. Questions for which >50% of the patients and caregivers thought were "very important" but >30% were dissatisfied include: understanding the cause of brain tumors, dealing with patients' lower energy, identifying healthful foods and activities for patients, telephone access to health care providers, information on medical insurance coverage, and support from their employer. In the emotional realm, caregivers identified 9 out of 10 items as important but need further improvement. Areas of high disagreement in satisfaction between participating patient-caregiver pairs include: getting help with household chores (P value = 0.006) and finding time for personal needs (P value < 0.001). This study provides insights into areas to improve services for brain tumor patients and their caregivers. The caregivers' highest amount of burden is placed on their emotional needs, emphasizing the importance of providing appropriate medical and psychosocial support for caregivers to cope with emotional difficulties they face during the patients' treatment process.