INTRODUCTION: Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is characterized by chronic scarring alopecia that is progressive and typically refractory to therapy. Current drug treatments are suboptimal and not applicable for long-term use because of the high potential for adverse effects, warranting safer and more effective treatment alternatives. METHODS: Based on our previous success in treating a patient with central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia using a topical botanical formulation (Gashee), we reviewed records of four patients with biopsy-proven LPP treated with the topical formulation alone or in combination with its oral preparation. Three patients had failed previous treatment with intralesional steroid injections, topical minoxidil, tacrolimus, and clobetasol. Physical examination and photographic documentation were also used as outcome measures. Treatment duration with the botanical formulations ranged from 6 weeks to 9.5 months. RESULTS: All patients showed overall improvement in surrogate indicators of LPP activity as evidenced by the disappearance of symptoms (pruritus, tenderness, scalp irritation, and hair shedding), improvement in hair growth, and reduction in redness. All reported a high satisfaction level and no adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with treatment-refractory LPP responded to a novel botanical treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published report of LPP responding to a plant-based natural treatment. Further evaluation of this treatment in a controlled trial with a larger number of patients is warranted.

INTRODUCTION: The difficulty of the follicular unit excision (FUE) hair transplantation procedure is currently attributed to hair curliness and subsurface angulation. Patients possessing the curliest hair shafts are considered the most challenging. Consequently, patients with these features are often denied FUE. However, this practice does not consider intrapatient variation in the graft attrition rate and the rates themselves, which are frequently low in very curly hair where the skin firmness/thickness is average. To better aid practitioners in predicting FUE performance, we have developed a new scoring system (the Sanusi FUE Score Scale [SFS Scale]) based on two major donor variables (hair and skin characteristics). MATERIAL AND METHOD: The scale assigns scores to each of three hair subtypes (straight-wavy, curly, and coily-kinky) and each of three skin subtypes (thick/firm, soft/thin, and medium thickness/firmness). The scores were weighted based on the assessment of 13 experienced FUE practitioners from around the globe, who were asked to score each of the three skin and hair characteristics for their contribution to FUE difficulty. RESULTS: On the contribution of skin characteristics to FUE difficulty, 12/13 (92%) practitioners assigned the highest (most difficult) score to thick/firm skin, with medium skin thickness/firmness being the least challenging. The same percentage of practitioners gave the highest difficulty score to coiled-kinky hair subtypes regarding the contribution of hair characteristics to FUE difficulty. All agreed that straight-wavy hair presents the least challenge to FUE performance. Tallying the scores of the skin and hair variables generates a final score range of 2-9, which is associated with five grades/classes of challenge in the FUE procedure, influencing the need for a specialized skill/nuanced approach or equipment. CONCLUSION: We developed a universal FUE donor scoring scale that accounts for the diversity of human hair and skin types. Further evaluation to determine the validity of this new classification system in predicting and grading FUE difficulty and patient outcomes is warranted.