Interactions between social units are a pervasive aspect of human and animal socioecology, influencing access to crucial resources such as food, safe habitats, and mates, which in turn affect fitness and population structure. Human-induced modifications of animal environments impact various behavioural aspects, including social structure, aggression, affiliation, and movement. Due to rapid urbanization, an increasing number of animal groups now inhabit anthropogenic areas, potentially leading to higher intergroup contact and resulting in intergroup conflict (IGC). Despite extensive research on changes in animal intragroup behaviour, little attention has been paid to how resource modifications and increased group density in anthropogenic areas affect interactions between social units. Moreover, the various human impacts are often conflated, whereas animals might exhibit different responses based on the scale and type of anthropogenic influence. This dissertation will, first, provide a conceptual framework illustrating how multiple scales of anthropogenic influences might lead to corresponding changes in intergroup relationships, either directly or by modifying intragroup behaviour (Chapter 1). This framework is then tested across various levels of socioecological complexity. To examine whether anthropogenic food affects group-level patterns of IGC, I developed an agent-based model called AnthroIGC, which helped uncover patterns of IGC emerging from various combinations of food characteristics such as abundance (number of food sites), depletion (number of items per site), and distribution (clumped vs. dispersed), as well as intragroup social characteristics like cohesion and skew in resource access (chapter 2). Next, using empirical data from three rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) groups inhabiting a (peri)urban landscape, I tested the role of sociodemographic attributes such as sex, dominance rank, coalitionary support, and social integration in driving inter-individual differences in participation (chapter 3), finding that males and subordinate individuals engaged in IGC more frequently compared to females and high-ranking females. Moreover, single and multilayer social network analyses revealed that strong coalitionary support connections increased participation in IGI, especially for individuals less integrated into the group in terms of their multilayer connections across different affiliative behaviours. Finally, individuals not only display inter-individual differences but also modify their participation decisions based on the context of IGC. In the final chapter (chapter 4), this thesis explores how various scales of anthropogenic food availability (current availability, long-term availability, and predictability), individual resource access, and the proximate social environment drive participation decisions in male and female rhesus macaques. Using data from 744 instances of IGC, the study finds that both male and female participation is influenced by availability and access to anthropogenic food. However, female participation is more affected by current food availability and differences in relative group size, while males balance both resource and mate access, with their participation patterns emerging as a complex balance between mating seasonality, group size, and the presence of dominant bystanders.This research extends the understanding of a fundamental animal behaviour, that is, interactions between social groups across diverse socioecological conditions and advocates for the extension of existing socioecological theory to human-modified landscapes, using a complex systems approach. Given the prevalence of interactions and conflicts between social units in current and evolutionary human history, studying such behaviour in an equally adaptable species like macaques can provide valuable insights into adaptive decision-making and the evolutionary trajectories of species in the Anthropocene.