Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence among persons older than 50 years has decreased in California and nationally, but incidence rates have increased among persons younger than 50 years. Previous studies present incidence rates among younger persons using a wide age group of 20-49 years. However, previous population-based studies did not analyze CRC incidence in subgroups defined by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and stage at diagnosis to better understand incidence trends among younger persons.

Methods/approach

We identified all people diagnosed with CRC at the age of 20-49 years from the California Cancer Registry (n = 39,298; 1988-2017). We used SEER*Stat and Joinpoint software to calculate average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) in incidence rates by age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, and stage. Age was divided into 10-year intervals (20-29, 30-39, and 40-49 years), stage was categorized as early- and late-stage, and race/ethnicity as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian groups.

Results

Statistically significant increases in early-stage CRC incidence rates were observed among the 20-29, 30-39, and 40-49-year age groups in male and female non-Hispanic White populations (AAPC, 6.3%, 3.3%, and 1.9%, respectively) and Hispanic populations (AAPC, 4.9%, 3.5%, and 2.3%, respectively). Statistically significant increases in late-stage CRC incidence rates were observed among all 3 age groups of male and female non-Hispanic White people (AAPC, 2.8%, 3.1%, and 1.7%, respectively) and Hispanic females (AAPC, 4.2%, 2.3%, and 1.1%, respectively). Statistically significant increases in late-stage CRC incidence rates were also seen in the 30-39 and 40-49-year age groups among non-Hispanic White females (AAPC, 3.4% and 1.8%, respectively), Hispanic males (AAPC, 3.6% and 1.6%, respectively), and Asian/Pacific Islander females (AAPC, 1.9% and 0.7%, respectively). Statistically significant increases in late-stage CRC incidence were observed among 40-to 49-year-old Asian/Pacific Islander males (AAPC, 1.4%) and American Indian males and females (AAPC, 5.5%).

Conclusion

CRC is increasing among several young age groups. Because evidence suggests that younger adults present with more advanced disease, these results may be useful for educating health care providers about CRC risk and suggest that CRC screening recommendations should be developed for this population. Continued surveillance of CRC incidence rates among young adults is warranted.

Background

Knowledge regarding late effects (medical conditions and subsequent neoplasms) in survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is lacking.

Methods

Using the population-based California Cancer Registry linked with California hospitalization data, we evaluated late effects in 1069 AYAs (aged 15-39 years) diagnosed with ALL in California between 1995 and 2012 and surviving a minimum of 3 years from diagnosis.

Results

The estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of subsequent endocrine disease (28.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 25.8% to 31.6%) and cardiac disease (17.0%, 95% CI = 14.6% to 19.5%) were strikingly high; avascular necrosis (9.6%, 95% CI = 7.8% to 11.6%), liver disease (6.5%, 95% CI = 5.0% to 8.3%), respiratory disease (6.2%, 95% CI = 4.8% to 8.0%), seizure and/or stroke (4.3%, 95% CI = 3.1% to 5.8%), renal disease (3.1%, 95% CI = 2.1% to 4.4%), and second neoplasms (1.4%, 95% CI = 0.7% to 2.4%) were estimated to occur at 10 years with the reported frequencies. Multivariable analyses including the entire patient cohort demonstrated that public or no insurance (vs private and/or military insurance) and receipt of hematopoietic cell transplantation were independently associated with the occurrence of all late effects considered. In multivariable analyses limited to the 766 AYAs who were not transplanted, we continued to find a statistically significant association between public and no insurance and the occurrence of all late effects. Frontline regimen type (pediatric vs adult) was not statistically significantly associated with any of the late effect categories.

Conclusions

This large population-based analysis is among the first to describe late effects in survivors of AYA ALL. The strong association between insurance type and late effects suggests that AYAs with public or no insurance may have reduced access to survivorship care following completion of ALL therapy.

Background

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with public or no insurance experience later stage at diagnosis and worse overall survival compared with those with private insurance. However, prior studies have not distinguished the survival impact of continuous Medicaid coverage prior to diagnosis compared with gaining Medicaid coverage at diagnosis.

Methods

We linked a cohort of AYAs aged 15-39 who were diagnosed with 13 common cancers from 2005 to 2014 in the California Cancer Registry with California Medicaid enrollment files to ascertain Medicaid enrollment, with other insurance determined from registry data. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the impact of insurance on survival, adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics.

Results

Among 62 218 AYAs, over 65% had private/military insurance, 10% received Medicaid at diagnosis, 13.2% had continuous Medicaid, 4.1% had discontinuous Medicaid, 1.7% had other public insurance, 3% were uninsured, and 2.6% had unknown insurance. Compared with those with private/military insurance, individuals with Medicaid insurance had significantly worse survival regardless of when coverage began (received Medicaid at diagnosis: hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.51 [1.42-1.61]; continuously Medicaid insured: 1.42 [1.33-1.52]; discontinuous Medicaid: 1.64 [1.49, 1.80]). Analyses of those with Medicaid insurance only demonstrated slightly worse cancer-specific survival among those with discontinuous Medicaid or enrollment at diagnosis compared with those with continuous enrollment, but results were not significant stratified by cancer site.

Conclusions and relevance

AYAs with Medicaid insurance experience worse cancer-specific survival compared with those with private/military insurance, yet continuous enrollment demonstrates slight survival improvements, providing potential opportunities for future policy intervention.

Background and objective

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with a median age of diagnosis of 66 years. Anthracycline-containing regimens are the most common treatments, but toxicity concerns can limit their use in patients older than 80 years. Understanding treatment patterns and associated survival in adults older than 80 years (vs adults aged 65-80 years) can help determine effective management strategies in this population. We sought to describe the impact of age on treatment regimens used and associated survival in older adults with DLBCL.

Methods

Data for 17,859 patients aged ≥65 years diagnosed with DLBCL from 2006 to 2017 were obtained from the California Cancer Registry. Detailed treatment information for each patient was extracted from treatment text fields. Multivariable logistic regression models examined characteristics associated with no treatment and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models examined the influence of treatment on overall survival and cancer specific survival.

Results

Across both examined age groups (65-80 years and older than 80 years), the most common treatment was anthracycline-containing regimens followed by other drug combinations. For patients older than 80 years, fewer received anthracyclines (32.4%) and more received other drug combinations (17.6%) or had no treatment (13.1%) vs those aged 65-80 years (61.6% anthracyclines, 10.4% other combinations, 5% no treatment). Women were less likely to receive treatment, as were those who were older, had more comorbidities, received treatment at non-National Cancer Institute designated cancer centers, or were diagnosed more recently. For patients older than 80 years, anthracyclines and R-CVP conferred a survival advantage compared to other combinations.

Conclusion

In this large, population-based group of older adults with DLBCL, patients older than 80 years were less likely to receive initial treatment and more likely to receive other drug combinations despite a survival advantage with more standard anthracycline and nonanthracycline regimen protocols.

Purpose

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common secondary cancer and has poorer survival than primary BC (pBC) after any prior malignancy. For BC survivors, developing a contralateral secondary BC (CSBC) is the most frequent second-cancer event and is currently treated similarly to pBC. Identifying survival differences between pBC and CSBC could influence future counseling and treatments for patients with CSBC.

Methods

Women (≥15 years) diagnosed with pBC from 1991 to 2015 in the California Cancer Registry (n = 377,176) were compared with those with CSBC (n = 15,586) by age group (15-39 years, n = 406; 40-64 years, n = 6814; ≥ 65 years, n = 8366). Multivariable logistic regression models assessed factors associated with CSBC. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models assessed BC-specific survival (BCSS), while accounting for the competing risk of death.

Results

Across all ages, CSBC patients were more likely to have smaller tumors (T2 vs. T1a; 15-39 yeras: OR 0.25, CI 0.16-0.38; 40-64 years: OR 0.41, CI 0.37-0.45; ≥ 65 years: OR 0.46, CI 0.42-0.51) and lymph node-negative disease (positive vs. negative; 15-39 years: OR 0.86, CI 0.69-1.08; 40-64 years: OR 0.88, CI 0.83-0.93; ≥ 65 years: OR 0.89, CI 0.84-0.94). Additionally, CSBC was associated with worse survival compared with pBC across all ages (15-39 years: HR 2.73, CI 2.30-3.25; 40-64 years: HR 2.13, CI 2.01-2.26; ≥ 65 years: HR 1.52, CI 1.43-1.61).

Conclusion

BCSS is worse among all women diagnosed with CSBC compared with pBC, with the strongest impact seen in adolescent and young adult women. Worse survival after CSBC, despite associations with smaller tumors and lymph node negativity, suggests that CSBC may need eventual treatment reconsideration.

Purpose

Through screening and HPV vaccination, cervical cancer can mostly be prevented or detected very early, before symptoms develop. However, cervical cancer persists, and many women are diagnosed at advanced stages. Little is known about the degree to which U.S. women may begin their diagnostic workup for cervical cancer in Emergency Departments (ED). We sought to quantify the proportion of women presenting symptomatically in the ED prior to their diagnosis with cervical cancer and to describe their characteristics and outcomes.

Methods

We identified women diagnosed from 2006 to 2017 with cervical cancer in the California Cancer Registry. We linked this cohort to statewide ED discharge records to determine ED use and symptoms present at the encounter. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations with ED use and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models examined associations with survival.

Results

Of the more than 16,000 women with cervical cancer in the study cohort, 28% presented symptomatically in the ED prior to diagnosis. Those presenting symptomatically were more likely to have public (odds ratio [OR] 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.27) or no insurance (OR 4.81; CI 4.06-5.71) (vs. private), low socioeconomic status (SES) (OR 1.76; CI 1.52-2.04), late-stage disease (OR 5.29; CI 4.70-5.96), and had a 37% increased risk of death (CI 1.28-1.46).

Conclusion

Nearly a third of women with cervical cancer presented symptomatically, outside of a primary care setting, suggesting that many women, especially those with low SES, may not be benefiting from screening or healthcare following abnormal results.

BACKGROUND: Multiple systemic treatments have been developed for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but their use and effect on outcomes at the population level are unknown. This study describes the utilization of first-line systemic treatments among stage IV NSCLC patients in California and compares survival among treatment groups. METHODS: Data on 17 254 patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC from 2012 to 2014 were obtained from the California Cancer Registry. Systemic treatments were classified into six groups. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare survival between treatment groups. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of patients were known to have received systemic treatment. For patients with nonsquamous histology, pemetrexed regimens were the most common treatment (14.8%) followed by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (11.9%) and platinum doublets (11.5%). Few patients received pemetrexed/bevacizumab combinations (4.5%), bevacizumab combinations (3.6%), or single agents (1.7%). There was statistically significantly better overall survival for those on pemetrexed regimens (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80 to 0.92), bevacizumab regimens (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.81), pemetrexed/bevacizumab regimens (HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.76), or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (HR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.67) compared with platinum doublets. The odds of receiving most systemic treatments decreased with decreasing socioeconomic status. For patients with squamous histology, platinum doublets were predominant (33.7%) and were not found to have statistically significantly different overall survival from single agents. CONCLUSIONS: These population-level findings indicate low utilization of systemic treatments, survival differences between treatment groups, and evident treatment disparities by socioeconomic status.

6532 Background: Our recent study showed that the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was associated with increased health insurance coverage among adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15–39 years) diagnosed with lymphomas in California and decreased likelihood of late stage at diagnosis. However, AYAs of Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity (vs Whites) and those living in lower socioeconomic (SES) neighborhoods were at higher risk of presenting with advanced stage. We aimed to determine whether the increased insurance coverage under the ACA was associated with improved survival, and to identify the main predictors of survival among AYAs with lymphomas. Methods: We used data from the California Cancer Registry linked to Medicaid enrollment files on AYAs diagnosed with a primary non-Hodgkin (NHL) or Hodgkin (HL) lymphoma during March 2005–September 2010 (pre-ACA), October 2010–December 2013 (early ACA) or 2014–2017 (full ACA). Patients were followed from lymphoma diagnosis until death, loss to follow-up or end of the study (12/31/2018). Health insurance was categorized as continuous Medicaid, discontinuous Medicaid, Medicaid enrollment at diagnosis/uninsured, other public or private. We used multivariable Cox proportional regression to examine the associations between all-cause survival and era of diagnosis, adjusting for sex, age and stage at diagnosis, health insurance, race/ethnicity, neighborhood SES, treatment facility, comorbidities, and marital status. Results: Of 11,221 AYAs, 5,878 were diagnosed with NHL and 5,343 with HL. Most patients were male (56%), White (45%), presented with earlier stage (I/II, 56%), and had private insurance (57%). The proportion of AYAs who received initial care at National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers (NCI-CCs) increased from 24% pre-ACA to 31% after full ACA implementation (p < 0.001). AYAs diagnosed in the early (aHR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.67–0.88) and full ACA (aHR = 0.55, 95%CI 0.47–0.64) eras had better survival than those diagnosed pre-ACA. Compared to those with private insurance, survival was worse among patients with no insurance (HR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.83–2.49), discontinuous Medicaid (HR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.83–2.56) and continuous Medicaid (HR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.63–2.29) at diagnosis. Regardless of their insurance, older AYAs, males, unmarried, those with later stage (II–IV), residents in lower SES neighborhoods, and those of Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaskan Native race/ethnicity experienced worse survival. Conclusions: Following the ACA implementation in California, AYAs diagnosed with lymphomas experienced increased access to care at NCI-CCs and improved survival. Yet, racial/ethnic and socioeconomic survival disparities persisted. Moving forward, policy actions are required to mitigate structural and social determinants of health disparities in this population.

Background

Through adequate screening and follow-up, cervical cancer can be prevented or detected at early-stage (stage I), which is related to excellent survival. Current guidelines recommend discontinuing screening for women ≥65 years with history of normal Pap and/or HPV tests, potentially leaving this age group vulnerable. This study examined late-stage disease in a population-based cohort.

Methods

Using California Cancer Registry data, we identified 12,442 patients ages ≥21 years with a first primary cervical cancer diagnosed during 2009-2018. Proportions of late-stage disease (stages II-IV) and early- and late-stage 5-year relative survival are presented by the age group. Among patients ages ≥65 years, multivariable logistic regression estimated associations of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with late-stage cervical cancer.

Results

Nearly one fifth of patients (n = 2,171, 17.4%) were ≥65 years. More women ages ≥65 years (71%) presented with late-stage disease than younger women (48% in patients ages <65). Late-stage 5-year relative survival was lower for women ≥65 years (23.2%-36.8%) compared with patients <65 (41.5%-51.5%). Characteristics associated with late-stage cervical cancer in women ≥65 years included older age [odds ratio (OR), 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.04; each year], non-adenocarcinoma histologic subtypes, and comorbidities (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.21-2.08).

Conclusions

There remains a significant burden of advanced cervical cancer in women ≥65.

Impact

Efforts should be made to better understand how the current screening paradigm is failing women of 65 years and older. Future work should focus on determining past screening history, lapses in follow-up care, and non-invasive testing approaches.