- Dewey, Kathryn G;
- Wessells, K Ryan;
- Arnold, Charles D;
- Prado, Elizabeth L;
- Abbeddou, Souheila;
- Adu-Afarwuah, Seth;
- Ali, Hasmot;
- Arnold, Benjamin F;
- Ashorn, Per;
- Ashorn, Ulla;
- Ashraf, Sania;
- Becquey, Elodie;
- Bendabenda, Jaden;
- Brown, Kenneth H;
- Christian, Parul;
- Colford, John M;
- Dulience, Sherlie JL;
- Fernald, Lia CH;
- Galasso, Emanuela;
- Hallamaa, Lotta;
- Hess, Sonja Y;
- Humphrey, Jean H;
- Huybregts, Lieven;
- Iannotti, Lora L;
- Jannat, Kaniz;
- Lartey, Anna;
- Le Port, Agnes;
- Leroy, Jef L;
- Luby, Stephen P;
- Maleta, Kenneth;
- Matias, Susana L;
- Mbuya, Mduduzi NN;
- Mridha, Malay K;
- Nkhoma, Minyanga;
- Null, Clair;
- Paul, Rina R;
- Okronipa, Harriet;
- Ouédraogo, Jean-Bosco;
- Pickering, Amy J;
- Prendergast, Andrew J;
- Ruel, Marie;
- Shaikh, Saijuddin;
- Weber, Ann M;
- Wolff, Patricia;
- Zongrone, Amanda;
- Stewart, Christine P
Background
Meta-analyses show that small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNSs) reduce child stunting and wasting. Identification of subgroups who benefit most from SQ-LNSs may facilitate program design.Objectives
We aimed to identify study-level and individual-level modifiers of the effect of SQ-LNSs on child growth outcomes.Methods
We conducted a 2-stage meta-analysis of individual participant data from 14 randomized controlled trials of SQ-LNSs provided to children 6-24 mo of age (n = 37,066). We generated study-specific and subgroup estimates of SQ-LNS compared with control and pooled the estimates using fixed-effects models. We used random-effects meta-regression to examine study-level effect modifiers. In sensitivity analyses, we examined whether results differed depending on study arm inclusion criteria and types of comparisons.Results
SQ-LNS provision decreased stunting (length-for-age z score < -2) by 12% (relative reduction), wasting [weight-for-length (WLZ) z score < -2] by 14%, low midupper arm circumference (MUAC) (<125 mm or MUAC-for-age z score < -2) by 18%, acute malnutrition (WLZ < -2 or MUAC < 125 mm) by 14%, underweight (weight-for-age z score < -2) by 13%, and small head size (head circumference-for-age z score < -2) by 9%. Effects of SQ-LNSs generally did not differ by study-level characteristics including region, stunting burden, malaria prevalence, sanitation, water quality, duration of supplementation, frequency of contact, or average compliance with SQ-LNS. Effects of SQ-LNSs on stunting, wasting, low MUAC, and small head size were greater among girls than among boys; effects on stunting, underweight, and low MUAC were greater among later-born (than among firstborn) children; and effects on wasting and acute malnutrition were greater among children in households with improved (as opposed to unimproved) sanitation.Conclusions
The positive impact of SQ-LNSs on growth is apparent across a variety of study-level contexts. Policy-makers and program planners should consider including SQ-LNSs in packages of interventions to prevent both stunting and wasting.This trial was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO as CRD42019146592.