Axially loaded piles in liquefiable soils can undergo severe settlements due to a shaking event. During shaking, the settlement is caused by the reduction of its shaft and tip capacity from the excess pore pressures generated around the pile. Post shaking, additional pile settlement is caused by the surrounding soil settling due to reconsolidation and the associated development of drag load. A new displacement-based method is developed using a TzQzLiq analysis for designing axially loaded piles subject to seismic loading and liquefaction-induced downdrag. The new displacement-based design method offers several advancements to the state of practice forced-based design procedure by AASHTO's force-based design procedure by reasonably accounting for the mechanisms that occur on axially loaded piles during and post shaking. It accounts for the initial drag load on the pile, redistribution effects resulting in large excess pore pressures in the non-liquefied layers, and reduction in the pile's shaft and tip capacity from excess pore pressures around the pile. The new design procedure estimates the pile settlement and axial load distribution during the entire shaking event, i.e., during shaking and reconsolidation. Design steps are provided describing the procedure for obtaining design curves on the settlement and drag load on piles with varying pile lengths. The length of the piles is then selected based on serviceability criteria and the pile's structural strength. Finally, the new design procedure is applied on piles used in centrifuge model tests, and results are compared, followed by an example design problem that illustrates the applicability of the new method in practice.

A two-dimensional nonlinear dynamic finite element (FE) model was developed and calibrated against dynamic centrifuge tests to study the behavior of soil-pile-structure systems in liquefied and laterally spreading ground during earthquakes. The centrifuge models included a simple structure supported on pile group. The soil profiles consisted of a gently sloping clay crust over liquefiable sand over dense sand. The FE model used an effective stress pressure dependent plasticity model for liquefiable soil and a total stress pressure independent plasticity model for clay, beam column elements for piles and structure, and interface springs that couple with the soil mesh for soil-structure interaction. The FE model was evaluated against recorded data for eight cases with same set of baseline parameters. Comparisons between analyses and experiments showed that the FE model was able to approximate the soil and structural responses and reproduce the lateral loads and bending moments on the piles reasonably well. © 2013, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.

Earthquake-induced soil liquefaction can cause soil settlement around piles, resulting in drag load and pile settlement after shaking stops. Estimating the axial load distribution and pile settlement is important for designing and evaluating the performance of axially loaded piles in liquefiable soils. Commonly used neutral plane solution methods model the liquefiable layer as an equivalent consolidating clay layer without considering the sequencing and pattern of excess pore pressure dissipation and soil settlement. Moreover, changes in the pile shaft and the tip resistance due to excess pore pressures are ignored. A TzQzLiq numerical model was developed using the existing TzLiq material and the new QzLiq material for modeling liquefaction-induced downdrag on piles. The model accounts for the change in the pile's shaft and tip capacity as free-field excess pore pressures develop or dissipate in soil. The developed numerical model was validated against data from a series of large centrifuge model tests, and the procedure for obtaining the necessary information and data from those is described. Additionally, a sensitivity study on TzLiq and QzLiq material properties was performed to study their effect on the developed drag load and pile settlement. Analysis results show that the proposed numerical model can reasonably predict the time histories of axial load distribution and settlement of axially loaded piles in liquefiable soils both during and postshaking.

Measuring displacements in model tests typically involves contact-based sensors such as linear potentiometers, where contact between two moving parts occurs at the sensing point. The sensor’s finite mass, the limited stiffness of the beams and the clamping mechanism, and the slippage and hinging of the sensor body could affect the object’s response and lead to measurement errors. Also, the physical mounting rack required to hold these sensors often obstructs the view and makes significant areas unavailable for conducting some other essential investigations. The advancement in high-speed, high-resolution and reasonably priced rugged cameras makes it feasible to obtain better displacement measurements by image analysis. This paper introduces a non-contact method that works by video recording the projection of laser lines on a test object to measure static and dynamic vertical displacements. The technique produces a continuous settlement distribution along the laser line passing through multiple objects of interest. This paper presents the theory for converting laser line images to displacements. The new method’s validity is demonstrated by comparing the results from other measurement techniques: hand measurements, linear potentiometers and three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry.

Earthquake-induced soil liquefaction can cause settlement around piles, which can translate to negative skin friction and the development of drag load and settlement of the piles. A series of centrifuge model tests were performed to assess liquefaction-induced downdrag and understand the interplay and effects of (1) pile embedment and pile-head load, (2) excess pore pressure generation and dissipation, and (3) reconsolidation and ground settlement on pile response during and postshaking. The model included a layered soil profile (clay, liquefiable sand, and dense sand) with two 635-mm-diameter instrumented piles. One pile was placed with its tip at the bottom of the liquefiable deposit; the other pile was embedded five diameters into the dense sand layer. The model was shaken with multiple earthquake motions with their peak horizontal accelerations ranging from 0.025 to 0.4 g. For each shaking event, the drag load on the piles first decreased during shaking and then increased during reconsolidation, exceeding its preshaking value. With multiple shaking events, the net drag load on the piles increased. The maximum observed drag load was found equal to the drained interface shear strength calculated from the interface friction angle of δ=30° and a lateral stress coefficient of K=1. Larger drag loads and smaller settlements were observed for the pile embedded deep in the dense sand layer. Most of the pile settlements occurred during shaking; postshaking pile settlement was less than 2% of the pile's diameter. The mechanisms behind the development of liquefaction-induced drag load on piles and settlements are described. Select ramifications concerning the design of piles in liquefiable soils are also described.

Earthquake-induced liquefaction can cause soil settlement at pile interfaces, which can induce negative skin friction resulting in additional load (known as drag load) and drag the pile downwards (Figure 1). Despite significant research on the effects of liquefaction on structures and the seismic response of piles, there is still a knowledge gap in the evolution and assessment of liquefaction-induced downdrag on piles mainly related to the complex interplay and timing of the different mechanisms during/post liquefaction such as excess pore pressure generation/dissipation patterns, sequencing and timing of settlements, presence of interface gaps and ejecta, location of the initial neutral plane, and settlement around the tip. This has led to simplifying assumptions in current design procedures, which might result in over-conservatism in drag load estimation. Commonly used numerical tools lack the ability to model these mechanisms, while the absence of experimental data hinders the development and validation of new models. A series of centrifuge tests were planned to investigate the factors affecting the magnitude of liquefaction-induced drag load and pile settlement. This report describes the results for the first test series (SKS02). The soil profile included 1 m of coarse sand layer, underlain by 4 m of clay crust and 9 m of liquefiable soil over deeper dense soil. The test involved two medium diameter (D) piles, with their tip embedded to the depth of 0D and 5D in the dense sand. The model was shaken with multiple scaled Santa Cruz earthquake motions with peak horizontal accelerations ranging from 0.025 g to 0.4 g. With multiple shakings, drag loads were observed to increase on the piles. Higher drag loads were observed on deeply embedded (5D) piles as compared to the shallow embedded (0D) pile. While significant settlements occurred in soil during and post shaking, the piles recorded considerably smaller settlements. Most of the pile settlement occurred during shaking and very small settlements happened during the reconsolidation phase. It was observed, that with multiple shakings, the overall drag load on the piles saturated and could become as large as the one interpreted from considering the negative skin friction on the pile in the liquefiable soil taken equal to the positive interface drained shear strength. 

Existing simplified procedures for evaluating soil liquefaction potential or for estimating excess pore pressures during earthquakes are typically based on undrained cyclic tests performed on saturated soil samples under controlled loading and boundary conditions. Under such conditions, the effect of excess pore pressure (ue) dissipation and redistribution to neighboring soil layers cannot be accounted for. Existing simplified procedures treat liquefiable layers as isolated soil layers without any boundary conditions even if dense and loose layers are very thin, permeable, and adjacent to each other. However, redistribution is likely to increase and decrease ue in the neighboring dense and loose layers respectively. Until now, no procedure short of fully coupled numerical analysis is available to estimate the importance of redistribution. This paper presents an approximate analytical procedure for assessing the effects of ue redistribution in (1) soil layers that would have liquefied if they were undrained, and (2) soil layers that would have not liquefied even if undrained. It is found that a layer that is initially assumed liquefied under undrained conditions might not even liquefy accounting for the ue redistribution to neighboring layers. On the other hand, a layer initially assumed to not liquefy can develop significant ue and can even liquefy due to pore pressure migration from the neighboring layers. Thus, accounting for redistributed ue is important for liquefaction consequence assessment quantification, particularly in systems that span the depth of these effects like deep foundations. Migration of u toward the tip of a pile can reduce its capacity, even if the tip is embedded in a dense sand layer. On the other hand, if redistribution can result in the reduction of ue in initially assumed liquefied layers, risks associated with liquefaction might be avoided. A criterion is also developed to evaluate the thicknesses of a layer below which redistribution could prevent liquefaction even if the layer is deemed liquefied according to the existing liquefaction-triggering procedures. Finally, the proposed procedure is illustrated by application to selected shaking events of centrifuge tests involving liquefaction of layered soil profiles. The predictions from the procedure matched the centrifuge test results reasonably.

Earthquake-induced liquefaction typically causes soil settlement which may lead to downdrag in axially loaded piles. The drag load generated may overstress the pile or cause significant foundation settlements. Despite significant research progress on the effects of liquefaction on structures and the seismic response of piles, there is still a knowledge gap in the assessment of liquefaction-induced downdrag. This paper discusses different factors that govern this mechanism and presents a parametric study performed using the AASHTO-recommended neutral plane method using displacement-based t-z spring analyses on a simplified profile where liquefiable layer depth and thickness, reconsolidation strains in dense and loose sand, tip conditions, and pile types (L/D ratios) are varied. The results obtained from this preliminary analysis draw some important conclusions regarding the performance of large, medium, and slender piles and are used to design centrifuge model tests to further investigate and understand the complex mechanisms under more realistic conditions