Background & aims

Smooth muscles of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and skeletal muscle of the crural diaphragm (esophagus hiatus) provide the sphincter mechanisms at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). We investigated differences in the 3-dimensional (3D) pressure profile of the LES and hiatal contraction between healthy subjects and patients with achalasia esophagus.

Methods

We performed a prospective study of 10 healthy subjects (controls; 7 male; mean age, 60 ± 15 years; mean body mass index, 25 ± 2) and 12 patients with a diagnosis of achalasia (7 male; mean age, 63 ± 13 years; mean body mass index, 26 ± 1), enrolled at a gastroenterology clinic. Participants underwent 3D high-resolution manometry (3DHRM) with a catheter equipped with 96 transducers (for the EGJ pressure recording). A 0.5-mm metal ball was taped close to the transducer number 1 of the 3DHRM catheter. EGJ pressure was recorded at end-expiration (LES pressure) and at the peak of forced inspiration (hiatal contraction). Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed to localize the circumferential location of the metal ball on the catheter. Esophagus, LES, stomach, right and left crus of the diaphragm, and spine were segmented in each CT scan slice images to construct the 3D morphology of the region.

Results

The metal ball was located at the 7 o'clock position in all controls. The circumferential orientation of metal ball was displaced 45 to 90 degrees in patients with achalasia compared with controls. The 3D-pressure profile of the EGJ at end-expiration and forced inspiration revealed marked differences between the groups. The LES turns to the left as it entered from the chest into the abdomen, forming an angle between the spine and LES. The spine-LES angle was smaller in patients with achalasia (104°) compared with controls (124°). Five of the 10 subjects with achalasia had physical breaks in the left crus of the diaphragm CONCLUSIONS: Besides LES, the 3D pressure profile of the EGJ can indicate anatomic and functional abnormalities of the crural diaphragm muscle in patients with achalasia esophagus. Further studies are needed to define the nature of hiatal and crural diaphragm dysfunction in patients with achalasia of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND & AIMS:In patients with achalasia esophagus, swallows induce simultaneous pressure waves known as esophageal pressurization. We studied the mechanism of esophageal pressurization and bolus flow patterns in patients with type 2 or type 3 achalasia. METHODS:We recorded high-resolution manometry with impedance and intraluminal ultrasound images concurrently in patients with type 2 achalasia (n = 6) or type 3 achalasia (n = 8) and in 10 healthy subjects (controls) during swallows of 5 mL of 0.5N saline. For each swallow, the ultrasound image was aligned with the pressure and impedance tracings to determine cavity and contact pressure, bolus arrival, bolus dwell time, and changes in muscle thickness at 5 cm and 10 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. RESULTS:In patients with type 2 achalasia, esophageal pressurization was associated with an increase in the muscle thickness and luminal narrowing but not complete luminal closure (ie, cavity pressure). Bolus arrival time in the distal esophagus after the onset of a swallow was delayed in patients with type 3 achalasia compared with control individuals because of early luminal closure. The early luminal closure was associated with a decrease in the muscle thickness. The bolus dwell time was shorter in patients with type 3 achalasia compared with control individuals. In patients with type 3 achalasia, the onset of simultaneous pressure wave was always a cavity pressure, but during contraction there were different periods of cavity and contact pressures in association with increases in muscle thickness that resulted in bolus segmentation. CONCLUSIONS:We observed distinct mechanisms of esophageal pressurization and bolus flow patterns in patients with type 2 or type 3 achalasia esophagus compared with control individuals. These findings will increase our understanding of the mechanisms of dysphagia.

Studies to date have failed to reveal the anatomical counterpart of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). We assessed the LES and esophageal hiatus morphology using a block containing the human LES and crural diaphragm, serially sectioned at 50 μm intervals and imaged at 8.2 μm/pixel resolution. A 3D reconstruction of the tissue block was reconstructed in which each of the 652 cross sectional images were also segmented to identify the boundaries of longitudinal (LM) and circular muscle (CM) layers. The CM fascicles on the ventral surface of LES are arranged in a helical/spiral fashion. On the other hand, the CM fascicles from the two sides cross midline on dorsal surface and continue as sling/oblique muscle on the stomach. Some of the LM fascicles of the esophagus leave the esophagus to enter into the crural diaphragm and the remainder terminate into the sling fibers of the stomach. The muscle fascicles of the right crus of diaphragm which form the esophageal hiatus are arranged like a "noose" around the esophagus. We propose that circumferential squeeze of the LES and crural diaphragm is generated by a unique myo-architectural design, each of which forms a "noose" around the esophagus.

Background/aims

The esophageal hiatus is formed by the right crus of the diaphragm in the majority of subjects. Contraction of the hiatus exerts a sphincter-like action on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The aim is to study the hiatal anatomy (using CT scan imaging) and function (using high-resolution manometry [HRM]), and esophageal motor function in patients with sliding and paraesophageal hiatal hernia.

Methods

We assessed normal subjects (n = 20), patients with sliding type 1 hernia (n = 18), paraesophageal type 2 hernia (n = 19), and mixed type 3 hernia (n = 19). Hernia diagnosis was confirmed on the upper gastrointestinal series. The hiatal morphology was constructed from the CT scan images. The LES pressure and relaxation, percent peristalsis, bolus pressure, and hiatal squeeze pressure were assessed by HRM.

Results

The CT images revealed that the esophageal hiatus is formed by the right crus of the diaphragm in all normal subjects and 86% of hernia patients. The hiatus is elliptical in shape with a surface area of 1037 mm² in normal subjects. The hiatal dimensions were larger in patients compared to normal subjects. The HRM revealed impaired LES relaxation and higher bolus pressure in patients with paraesophageal compared to the sliding hernia. The hiatal pinch on HRM was recognized in significantly higher number of patients with sliding as compared to paraesophageal hernia.

Conclusions

Using a novel approach, we provide details of the esophageal hiatus in patients with various kinds of hiatal hernia. Impaired LES relaxation in paraesophageal hernia may play a role in its pathophysiology and genesis of symptoms.