Objective

Infantile spasms (IS) represent a severe epileptic encephalopathy presenting in the first 2 years of life. Recommended first-line therapies (hormonal therapy or vigabatrin) often fail. We evaluated response to second treatment for IS in children in whom the initial therapy failed to produce both clinical remission and electrographic resolution of hypsarhythmia and whether time to treatment was related to outcome.

Methods

The National Infantile Spasms Consortium established a multicenter, prospective database enrolling infants with new diagnosis of IS. Children were considered nonresponders to first treatment if there was no clinical remission or persistence of hypsarhythmia. Treatment was evaluated as hormonal therapy (adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH] or oral corticosteroids), vigabatrin, or "other." Standard treatments (hormonal and vigabatrin) were compared to all other nonstandard treatments. We compared response rates using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

One hundred eighteen infants were included from 19 centers. Overall response rate to a second treatment was 37% (n = 44). Children who received standard medications with differing mechanisms for first and second treatment had higher response rates than other sequences (27/49 [55%] vs. 17/69 [25%], p < 0.001). Children receiving first treatment within 4 weeks of IS onset had a higher response rate to second treatment than those initially treated later (36/82 [44%] vs. 8/34 [24%], p = 0.040).

Significance

Greater than one third of children with IS will respond to a second medication. Choosing a standard medication (ACTH, oral corticosteroids, or vigabatrin) that has a different mechanism of action appears to be more effective. Rapid initial treatment increases the likelihood of response to the second treatment.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of initial treatment for infantile spasms.

Methods

The National Infantile Spasms Consortium prospectively followed up children with new-onset infantile spasms that began at age 2 to 24 months at 23 US centers (2012-2018). Freedom from treatment failure at 60 days required no second treatment for infantile spasms and no clinical spasms after 30 days of treatment initiation. We managed treatment selection bias with propensity score weighting and within-center correlation with generalized estimating equations.

Results

Freedom from treatment failure rates were as follows: adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) 88 of 190 (46%), oral steroids 42 of 95 (44%), vigabatrin 32 of 87 (37%), and nonstandard therapy 4 of 51 (8%). Changing from oral steroids to ACTH was not estimated to affect response (observed 44% estimated to change to 44% [95% confidence interval 34%-54%]). Changing from nonstandard therapy to ACTH would improve response from 8% to 39% (17%-67%), and changing to oral steroids would improve response from 8% to 38% (15%-68%). There were large but not statistically significant estimated effects of changing from vigabatrin to ACTH (29% to 42% [15%-75%]), from vigabatrin to oral steroids (29% to 42% [28%-57%]), and from nonstandard therapy to vigabatrin (8% to 20% [6%-50%]). Among children treated with vigabatrin, those with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) responded more often than others (62% vs 29%; p < 0.05).

Discussion

Compared to nonstandard therapy, ACTH and oral steroids are superior for initial treatment of infantile spasms. The estimated effectiveness of vigabatrin is between that of ACTH/oral steroids and nonstandard therapy, although the sample was underpowered for statistical confidence. When used, vigabatrin worked best for TSC.

Classification of evidence

This study provides Class III evidence that for children with new-onset infantile spasms, ACTH or oral steroids were superior to nonstandard therapies.