BACKGROUND: The ultra-Orthodox Jewish community has a unique lifestyle including minimal outdoor activity and intense, prolonged nearby work, beginning at a very young age. Their prevalence of myopia is extremely high. This paper provides a unique insight into the attitudes of this community towards myopia. METHODS: Ultra-Orthodox Jewish parents of children who came to the pediatric ophthalmology clinic in one tertiary care and two community centers in ultra-Orthodox-oriented cities were given a questionnaire. Demographic information, along with myopia prevalence in the family, was gathered. In addition, their attitudes and common knowledge regarding myopia were investigated. RESULTS: 161 questioners were collected, mostly completed by mothers (n = 110, 68%). The average number of children per family was 6 (range 1-16). In 148 families (92%) at least one of the parents has myopia. The average parent refraction was - 4.5 diopters (range - 0.5 to 15 diopters). Out of 935 children, 410 (44%) wore glasses. Twelve parents (7%) believe that myopia is a disease and 94 (58%) reported that they are concerned because their child wears glasses. Twenty-four (15%) believe that glasses are a sign of a high education level. Regarding treating myopia progression, 144 (89%) think that myopia progression should be treated, but only 36 (22%) are aware of the available treatments for it. CONCLUSION: This study examines an insular community with a very high incidence of myopia. In this community most parents think that myopia progression should be treated but most of them are unaware of the currently available treatments.

Purpose

To report the characteristics of patients with restrictive diplopia following pterygium excision and a successful treatment approach for the strabismus.

Design

Retrospective interventional case series.

Methods

This study was set in a single academic institution and included 15 patients with restrictive diplopia after pterygium excision. Patients with any other reason for strabismus were excluded. Patients were evaluated for deficits with special attention to diplopic measures. The intervention was a combined procedure by a strabismologist and oculoplastic surgeon to correct the diplopia. The primary outcome measurements were subjective and objective improvement of diplopia.

Results

Fifteen patients (mean age = 49 years) who developed diplopia after pterygium excision were included. Mean time to diplopia was 6 months. All patients had limited abduction in the previously operated eye causing esotropia in the abductive field (mean deviation = 18 prism diopters). After intervention, all patients were no longer diplopic in primary gaze. In the abductive field, 11 (73%) patients had residual small angle esotropia (mean = 7 prism diopters) in ipsilateral extreme end-gaze only. Only 2 patients required additional surgical intervention for scar tissue removal. No patients underwent medial rectus recession.

Conclusions

Restrictive diplopia is a potential complication after pterygium excision, particularly for patients with a history of recurrent pterygia requiring multiple excisions and previous amniotic membrane graft placement with fibrin glue. However, diplopia after pterygium excision in primary position is surgically correctable with scar tissue removal and ocular surface reconstruction, without needing medial rectus recession. Given the high volume of pterygium excision, awareness of postoperative restrictive strabismus and the potential for correction is critical.