Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibition is a commonly used tool to prevent vascular proliferation in tumors and retinal diseases. The antiangiogenic effects of these drugs have made them potent adjunct therapies when given systemically for malignancies. They are also useful tools to ameliorate diminishing eyesight in retinopathy. Hypertension and proteinuria have been observed in systemic VEGF inhibitor therapy, with rarer presentations involving nephrotic-range proteinuria due to glomerulopathies. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown detectable blood levels of anti-VEGF inhibitors up to 30 days postintravitreal injection. Animal studies have also demonstrated binding of VEGF inhibitors in simian glomeruli 1 week after a single intravitreal injection. We report three patients who received intravitreal bevacizumab and/or aflibercept with worsening hypertension, proteinuria and renal injury. Data regarding emerging evidence of VEGF inhibitor nephrotoxicity after intravitreal injections are also presented. The clinical data and the existing literature are reviewed to support the hypothesis that intravitreal anti-VEGF agents may be unrecognized nephrotoxins. These agents are given to vulnerable patients with diabetes, hypertension and preexisting nephropathy and proteinuria. This case series is reported to spur further study of the systemic effects of intravitreal VEGF inhibitors.

Rationale & objective

Euvolemic hyponatremia often occurs due to the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). Vasopressin 2 receptor antagonists may be used to treat SIADH. Several of the major trials used 15 mg of tolvaptan as the lowest effective dose in euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. However, a recent observational study suggested an elevated risk for serum sodium level overcorrection with 15 mg of tolvaptan in patients with SIADH.

Study design

A retrospective chart review study comparing outcomes in patients with SIADH treated with 15 versus 7.5 mg of tolvaptan.

Settings & participants

Patients with SIADH who were treated with a very low dose of tolvaptan (7.5 mg) at a single center compared with patients using a 15-mg dose from patient-level data from the observational study described previously.

Predictors

Tolvaptan dose of 7.5 versus 15 mg daily.

Outcomes

Appropriate response to tolvaptan, defined as an initial increase in serum sodium level > 3 mEq/L, and overcorrection of serum sodium level (>8 mEq/L per day, and >10 mEq/L per day in sensitivity analyses).

Analytical approach

Descriptive study with additional outcomes compared using t tests and F-tests (Fischer's Exact χ2 Test).

Results

Among 18 patients receiving 7.5 mg of tolvaptan, the mean rate of correction was 5.6 ± 3.1 mEq/L per day and 2 (11.1%) patients corrected their serum sodium levels by >8 mEq/L per day, with 1 of these increasing by >12 mEq/L per day. Of those receiving tolvaptan 7.5 mg, 14 had efficacy, with increases ≥ 3 mEq/L; similar results were seen with the 15-mg dose (21 of 28). There was a statistically significant higher chance of overcorrection with the use of 15 versus 7.5 mg of tolvaptan (11 of 28 vs 2 of 18; P = 0.05; and 10 of 28 vs 1 of 18; P = 0.03, for >8 mEq/L per day and >10 mEq/L per day, respectively).

Limitations

Small sample size, retrospective, and nonrandomized.

Conclusions

Tolvaptan, 7.5 mg, daily corrects hyponatremia with similar efficacy and less risk for overcorrection in patients with SIADH versus 15 mg of tolvaptan.

C3 dominant immunofluorescence staining is present in a subset of patients with idiopathic immune complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (iMPGN). It is increasingly recognized that iMPGN may be complement driven, as are cases of typical C3 glomerulopathy (C3G). In both iMPGN and C3G, a frequent membranoproliferative pattern of glomerular injury may indicate common pathogenic mechanisms via complement activation and endothelial cell damage. Dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway and mutations in certain regulatory factors are highly implicated in C3 glomerulopathy (which encompasses C3 glomerulonephritis, dense deposit disease, and cases of C3 dominant MPGN). We report three cases that demonstrate that an initial biopsy diagnosis of iMPGN does not exclude complement alterations similar to the ones observed in patients with a diagnosis of C3G. The first patient is a 39-year-old woman with iMPGN and C3 dominant staining, with persistently low C3 levels throughout her course. The second case is a 22-year-old woman with elevated anti-factor H antibodies and C3 dominant iMPGN findings on biopsy. The third case is a 25-year-old woman with C3 dominant iMPGN, dense deposit disease, and a crescentic glomerulonephritis on biopsy. We present the varied phenotypic variations of C3 dominant MPGN and review clinical course, complement profiles, genetic testing, treatment course, and peri-transplantation plans. Testing for complement involvement in iMPGN is important given emerging treatment options and transplant planning.