Purpose

To describe a unique case of LASIK flap fungal keratitis confirmed by next generation sequencing.

Observations

A 56-year-old female presented with refractory keratitis involving her LASIK flap 21 years after surgery. Confocal was positive for filamentous structures. The patient underwent immediate flap amputation followed by topical antifungal treatment. Corneal culture was positive for Acremonium sp. Metagenomic deep sequencing confirmed Acremonium as the primary source of infection and also identified Fusarium as a likely contributor of a mixed fungal infection. Sequencing also identified hay as the likely source of the infection. Treatment resulted in eradication of the infection. The patient's final best corrected visual acuity was 20/30 with rigid contact lens overrefraction.

Conclusions

Metagenomic deep sequencing is a novel diagnostic tool that is increasingly being utilized for diagnosis of refractory keratitis. This case demonstrates the diagnostic potential of deep sequencing for identifying post-LASIK keratitis and reinforces the utility of LASIK flap amputation in the setting of tectonic flap instability due to keratolysis.

Importance

This case highlights several important clinical points for treating LASIK flap keratitis and highlights the emerging role metagenomic sequencing has in the diagnosis of infectious keratitis. This is first known case using next generation sequencing to diagnose a post-LASIK infectious keratitis.

PURPOSE: There is a need to understand physicians diagnostic uncertainty in the initial management of microbial keratitis (MK). This study aimed to understand corneal specialists diagnostic uncertainty by establishing risk thresholds for treatment of MK that could be used to inform a decision curve analysis for prediction modeling. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of corneal specialists with at least 2 years clinical experience was conducted. Clinicians provided the percentage risk at which they would always or never treat MK types (bacterial, fungal, herpetic, and amoebic) based on initial ulcer sizes and locations (<2 mm 2 central, <2 mm 2 peripheral, and >8 mm 2 central). RESULTS: Seventy-two of 99 ophthalmologists participated who were 50% female with an average of 14.7 (SD = 10.1) years of experience, 60% in academic practices, and 38% outside the United States. Clinicians reported they would never and always treat a <2 mm 2 central MK infection if the median risk was 0% and 20% for bacterial (interquartile range, IQR = 0-5 and 5-50), 4.5% and 27.5% for herpetic (IQR = 0-10 and 10-50), 5% and 50% for fungal (IQR = 0-10 and 20-75), and 5% and 50.5% for amoebic (IQR = 0-20 and 32-80), respectively. Mixed-effects models showed lower thresholds to treat larger and central infections ( P < 0.001, respectively), and thresholds to always treat differed between MK types for the United States ( P < 0.001) but not international clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: Risk thresholds to treat differed by practice locations and MK types, location, and size. Researchers can use these thresholds to understand when a clinician is uncertain and to create decision support tools to guide clinicians treatment decisions.