John Fitchís (1972) report on CA-SLO-2 is perhaps the
single most iconic study of fish remains in California. The
site was excavated by Roberta Greenwood in 1968, and
Fitch devoted over 900 hours to the analysis of (mostly)
otoliths from a single column sample, leaving non-otoliths
from the column and other remains from the rest of
Greenwoodís excavations unexamined. For this study, we
analyzed the previously unidentified remains (consisting
primarily of vertebrae) and compared the results with
those from Fitchís otolith study and Greenwoodís 6 mm.
excavation units. Not surprisingly, we found additional
and smaller fishes in the micromesh samples. Since
Fitchís report is the only one in California that we are
aware of that has identified remains of the wolf-eel
(Anarrhichthys ocellatus), we sought to determine if the
identification of this species was credible. We conclude
that prickleback (Xiphister sp.) teeth were misidentified
as wolf-eel, and consequently that wolf-eel has yet to
be documented as a fish used by Native Californians.
This is consistent with the general lack of evidence for
the exploitation of large and/or pelagic fishes along the
central California coast. Furthermore, all three samples
suggest that rockfishes (Sebastes spp.) and northern
anchovy (Engraulis mordax) were consistently important
to the Diablo Cove fishers. Other small schooling fishes,
including herrings (Clupeidae), night smelt (Spirinchus
starksi), and New World silversides (Atherinopsidae),
were important as well, but comparisons between
methods and the use of micromesh samples do not
necessarily indicate the relative importance of small
versus large fish. Diachronic comparisons from all three
samples indicate that fishing increased during the Middle
Period. Two of the three data sets suggest that fishing
then declined at Diablo Canyon during the Late Period.