Neurodegenerative diseases are a common cause of morbidity and cognitive impairment in older adults. Most clinicians who care for the elderly are not trained to diagnose these conditions, perhaps other than typical Alzheimer's disease (AD). Each of these disorders has varied epidemiology, clinical symptomatology, laboratory and neuroimaging features, neuropathology, and management. Thus, it is important that clinicians be able to differentiate and diagnose these conditions accurately. This review summarizes and highlights clinical aspects of several of the most commonly encountered neurodegenerative diseases, including AD, frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and its variants, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), Parkinson's disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and Huntington's disease (HD). For each condition, we provide a brief overview of the epidemiology, defining clinical symptoms and diagnostic criteria, relevant imaging and laboratory features, genetics, pathology, treatments, and differential diagnosis.

Background and objectives

In response to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the University of California San Francisco Memory and Aging Center (UCSF MAC) has deployed a comprehensive telemedicine model for the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer disease and related dementias. This review summarizes a large academic behavioral neurology clinic's experience transitioning to telemedicine services, including the impact on clinic care indicators, access metrics, and provider's experience. We compared these outcomes from 3 years before COVID-19 to 12 months after the transition to video teleconferencing (VTC) encounters.

Methods

Patient demographics and appointment data (dates, visit types, and departments) were extracted from our institution's electronic health record database from January 1, 2017, to May 1, 2021. We present data as descriptive statistics and comparisons using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Fisher exact tests. The results of anonymous surveys conducted among the clinic's providers are reported as descriptive findings.

Results

After the implementation of telemedicine services, the proportion of clinic encounters completed via VTC increased from 1.9% to 86.4%. There was a statistically significant decline in both the percentage of scheduled appointments that were canceled (32.9% vs 27.9%; p < 0.01) and total cancelations per month (mean 240.3 vs 179.4/mo; p < 0.01). There was an increase in the percentage of completed scheduled appointments (60.2% vs 64.8%; p < 0.01) and an increase in the average estimated commuting distance patients would need to drive for follow-up appointments (mean 49.8 vs 54.7 miles; p < 0.01). The transition to telemedicine services did not significantly affect the clinic's patient population as measured by age, gender, estimated income, area deprivation index, or self-reported racial/ethnic identity. The results of the provider survey revealed that physicians reported a more positive experience relative to neuropsychologists. Both types of providers reported telemedicine services as a reasonable equivalent and acceptable alternative to in-person evaluations with notable caveats.

Discussion

UCSF MAC's comprehensive integration of telemedicine services maintained critical ambulatory care to patients living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic. The recognized benefits of our care model suggest dementia telemedicine may be used as a feasible and equivalent alternative to in-person ambulatory care in the after COVID-19 era.