- Melville, Jane;
- Chapple, David G;
- Keogh, J Scott;
- Sumner, Joanna;
- Amey, Andrew;
- Bowles, Phil;
- Brennan, Ian G;
- Couper, Patrick;
- Donnellan, Stephen C;
- Doughty, Paul;
- Edwards, Danielle L;
- Ellis, Ryan J;
- Esquerré, Damien;
- Fenker, Jéssica;
- Gardner, Michael G;
- Georges, Arthur;
- Haines, Margaret L;
- Hoskin, Conrad J;
- Hutchinson, Mark;
- Moritz, Craig;
- Nankivell, James;
- Oliver, Paul;
- Pavón-Vázquez, Carlos J;
- Pepper, Mitzy;
- Rabosky, Daniel L;
- Sanders, Kate;
- Shea, Glenn;
- Singhal, Sonal;
- Wilmer, Jessica Worthington;
- Tingley, Reid
- Editor(s): Dobson, Andy P
Global biodiversity loss is a profound consequence of human activity. Disturbingly, biodiversity loss is greater than realized because of the unknown number of undocumented species. Conservation fundamentally relies on taxonomic recognition of species, but only a fraction of biodiversity is described. Here, we provide a new quantitative approach for prioritizing rigorous taxonomic research for conservation. We implement this approach in a highly diverse vertebrate group-Australian lizards and snakes. Of 870 species assessed, we identified 282 (32.4%) with taxonomic uncertainty, of which 17.6% likely comprise undescribed species of conservation concern. We identify 24 species in need of immediate taxonomic attention to facilitate conservation. Using a broadly applicable return-on-investment framework, we demonstrate the importance of prioritizing the fundamental work of identifying species before they are lost.