Dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are high-flow acquired shunts that can carry high risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Because DAVFs can often be managed by endovascular means, early and accurate diagnosis can markedly improve patient morbidity. Time-of-flight and arterial spin-labeling MRA have increased the diagnostic utility of MRI for DAVF by showing hemodynamic rather than anatomic evidence of shunting. The purpose of this article is to describe the cases of seven patients who had co-localization of arterial spin-labeling signal intensity and time-of-flight flow-related enhancement in the left skull base, resulting in a misdiagnosis of DAVF and a recommendation for catheter angiography by the interpreting radiologist. Benign jugular venous reflux is identified as a common mechanism in each case, and the physiology behind this imaging pitfall is described. An algorithmic diagnostic approach to differentiating physiologic venous reflux from true posterior skull base DAVFs is presented.

Background and purpose

Do children have an increased risk for brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) recurrence compared with adults and does this risk vary depending on initial presentation with AVM rupture?

Methods

We retrospectively studied 115 patients initially presenting with brain AVM under age 25 years who underwent complete surgical resection of the AVM as documented by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and had delayed follow-up DSA to evaluate for AVM recurrence after apparent initial cure.

Results

The mean time from baseline DSA to follow-up DSA was 2.3 years, ranging from 0 to 15 years. Twelve patients (10.4% of the 115 patient cohort and 16.7% of 72 patients with hemorrhage at initial presentation) demonstrated AVM recurrence on follow-up DSA. All patients with recurrence initially presented with intracranial hemorrhage, and intracranial hemorrhage was a significant predictor of recurrence (log rank P=0.037). Among patients with initial hemorrhage, the 5-year recurrence rate was 17.8% (95% CI, 8.3%-35.7%). All recurrences occurred in patients who were children at the time of their initial presentation; the oldest was 15 years of age at the time of initial AVM surgery. The 5-year recurrence rate for children (0-18 years of age) with an initial presentation of hemorrhage was 21.4% (95% CI, 10.1%-41.9%). Using Cox regression, we found the risk of AVM recurrence decreased by 14% per each year increase in age at the time of initial surgical resection (hazard ratio=0.86 [95% CI, 0.75-0.99]; P=0.031).

Conclusions

There is a high rate of recurrence of apparently cured brain AVMs in children who initially present with AVM rupture. Imaging follow-up is warranted to prevent re-rupture.

Background For patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular mechanical thrombectomy with x-ray angiography, the use of adjuncts to maintain vessel patency, such as stents or antiplatelet medications, can increase risk of periprocedural complications. Criteria for using these adjuncts are not well defined. Purpose To evaluate use of MRI to guide critical decision making by using a combined biplane x-ray neuroangiography 3.0-T MRI suite during acute ischemic stroke intervention. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational study evaluated consecutive patients undergoing endovascular intervention for acute ischemic stroke between July 2019 and May 2020 who underwent either angiography with MRI or angiography alone. Cerebral tissue viability was assessed by using MRI as the reference standard. For statistical analysis, Fisher exact test and Student t test were used to compare groups. Results Of 47 patients undergoing acute stroke intervention, 12 patients (median age, 69 years; interquartile range, 60-77 years; nine men) underwent x-ray angiography with MRI whereas the remaining 35 patients (median age, 80 years; interquartile range, 68-86 years; 22 men) underwent angiography alone. MRI results influenced clinical decision making in one of three ways: whether or not to perform initial or additional mechanical thrombectomy, whether or not to place an intracranial stent, and administration of antithrombotic or blood pressure medications. In this initial experience, decision making during endovascular acute stroke intervention in the combined angiography-MRI suite was better informed at MRI, such that therapy was guided in real time by the viability of the at-risk cerebral tissue. Conclusion Integrating intraprocedural 3.0-T MRI into acute ischemic stroke treatment was feasible and guided decisions of whether or not to continue thrombectomy, to place stents, or to administer antithrombotic medication or provide blood pressure medications. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Lev and Leslie-Mazwi in this issue.