- Clyde, Merlise A;
- Weber, Rachel Palmieri;
- Iversen, Edwin S;
- Poole, Elizabeth M;
- Doherty, Jennifer A;
- Goodman, Marc T;
- Ness, Roberta B;
- Risch, Harvey A;
- Rossing, Mary Anne;
- Terry, Kathryn L;
- Wentzensen, Nicolas;
- Whittemore, Alice S;
- Anton-Culver, Hoda;
- Bandera, Elisa V;
- Berchuck, Andrew;
- Carney, Michael E;
- Cramer, Daniel W;
- Cunningham, Julie M;
- Cushing-Haugen, Kara L;
- Edwards, Robert P;
- Fridley, Brooke L;
- Goode, Ellen L;
- Lurie, Galina;
- McGuire, Valerie;
- Modugno, Francesmary;
- Moysich, Kirsten B;
- Olson, Sara H;
- Pearce, Celeste Leigh;
- Pike, Malcolm C;
- Rothstein, Joseph H;
- Sellers, Thomas A;
- Sieh, Weiva;
- Stram, Daniel;
- Thompson, Pamela J;
- Vierkant, Robert A;
- Wicklund, Kristine G;
- Wu, Anna H;
- Ziogas, Argyrios;
- Tworoger, Shelley S;
- Schildkraut, Joellen M
Previously developed models for predicting absolute risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer have included a limited number of risk factors and have had low discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) < 0.60). Because of this, we developed and internally validated a relative risk prediction model that incorporates 17 established epidemiologic risk factors and 17 genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using data from 11 case-control studies in the United States (5,793 cases; 9,512 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (data accrued from 1992 to 2010). We developed a hierarchical logistic regression model for predicting case-control status that included imputation of missing data. We randomly divided the data into an 80% training sample and used the remaining 20% for model evaluation. The AUC for the full model was 0.664. A reduced model without SNPs performed similarly (AUC = 0.649). Both models performed better than a baseline model that included age and study site only (AUC = 0.563). The best predictive power was obtained in the full model among women younger than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.714); however, the addition of SNPs increased the AUC the most for women older than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.638 vs. 0.616). Adapting this improved model to estimate absolute risk and evaluating it in prospective data sets is warranted.