The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical validity of functional flexion-extension roentgenograms of the lumbar spine in a defined patient population. One hundred and one adults with low-back pain or functional disorders underwent passive functional flexion-extension examinations. Their roentgenograms were analyzed using a computer-assisted method to determine segmental motion parameters such as rotation and translation of the lumbar vertebrae. The patient population was broken down into five groups with similar pathologies or physical conditions, and their motion parameters compared to a normal population and to each other. It was found that all of the patient groups exhibited significantly hypomobile motion, spread equally among all levels, in comparison to the normal population, except for the group of high-performance athletes, who had significant hypermobility. The uniform spread of hypomobility limits the ability to distinguish with any confidence between the four pathologic groups by their motion. Thus, we believe that the analysis of the segmental motion of the lumbar spine using passive flexion-extension roentgenograms does not aid in differentiating the underlying pathologic condition of patients with low-back pain, and that no useful information can be derived form this procedure, especially in relation to the need for surgical intervention.

Several attempts have been made to measure the segmental range of motion in the lumbar spine during flexion-extension with the purpose of gathering additional data for the diagnosis of instability. The previous studies were performed in vitro or in vivo during active motion. The aim of this study was to obtain normal values of passively performed segmental motions. Forty-one healthy adults were examined by means of functional radiographs during flexion-extension and lateral bending. A graphic construction method and a computer-assisted method were used to measure rotations. Comparing with recent in vivo studies, the values obtained for normal angles of rotation were predominately larger. This might be due to the passive examination used in the study. The graphic construction method and computer-assisted method techniques are equally reliable, but the computer-assisted method method yields other important kinematic data, such as translations. It is proposed that passive motion be applied during functional examination of patients with suspected instabilities. However, the large variation of rotational values between individuals in the normal population may limit the clinical usefulness of functional lumbar analysis using this parameter. Future studies should explore the clinical relevance of determining altered segmental mobility in low-back pain patients.

Summary of background data

Although the extent of injury after cervical spine fracture can be visualized by imaging, the deformations that occur in the spinal canal during injury are unknown.

Study design

This study compared spinal canal occlusion and axial length changes occurring during a simulated compressive burst fracture with the residual deformations after the injury.

Methods

Canal occlusion was measured from changes in pressure in a flexible tube with fluid flowing through it, placed in the canal space after removal of the cord in cadaver specimens. To measure canal axial length, cables were fixed in C1 and led through the foramen transversarium from C2-T1, then out through the base, where they were connected to the core rods of linearly variable differential transformers (LVDT). Axial compressive burst fractures were created in each of ten cadaveric cervical spine specimens using a drop-weight, while force, distraction, and occlusion were monitored throughout the injury event. Pre- and post-injury radiographs and computed tomography scans compared transient and post-injury spinal canal geometry changes.

Results

In all cases, severe compressive injuries were produced. Three had an extension component in addition to compression of the vertebra and retropulsion of bone into the canal. The mean post-injury axial height loss measured from radiographs was only 35% of that measured transiently (3.1 mm post-injury, compared with 8.9 mm measured transiently), indicating significant recovery of axial height after impact. Post-injury and transient height loss were not significantly correlated (r2 = 0.230, P = 0.16) demonstrating that it is not a good measure of the extent of injury. Similarly, mean post injury canal area was 139% of the minimum area measured during impact, indicating recovery of canal space, and post-injury and transient values were not significantly correlated (r2 = 0.272, P = 0.12). Mean post-injury midsagittal diameter was 269% of the minimum transient diameter and showed a weak but significant correlation (r2 = 0.481, P = 0.03).

Conclusions

Two potential spinal cord injury-causing mechanisms in axial bursting injuries of the cervical spine are occlusion and shortening of the canal. Post-injury radiographic measurements significantly underestimate the actual transient injury that occurs during impact.