Despite good intentions for disabled communities, research and design products and processes often lead to unintended harm and negative effects. Like sexism and racism, ableism is woven throughout our technological, cultural, and social ecosystems by default [7–10]. Engineers and designers working in the space of accessibility and assistive technology want to do good and improve the lives of others. However, without addressing systemic ableism and its intersection with race, gender, economic status, etc. we risk harm surfacing through our designed worlds and processes. Traditional technology development and human-computer interaction practices do not provide the tools to consider systemic issues. To understand what practices of resistance and liberation look like in the context of technology and disability, this dissertation looks at how social justice orientations change the day-to-day work of researchers and designers.To explore this area, this dissertation includes a systematic literature review of social justice in HCI, semi-structured interviews with those interested in disability justice and technology, and the development of a novel method that carries values found in the literature review and interviews. Through the results of these studies, this dissertation provides actionable practices for future technologists seeking to bring just and equitable practices into their work.